Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise vs Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise
Overall, Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise
Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'Alaska à la bordelai... | Filets gourmet à la Bordelai... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 168 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has 13% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 168 kcal).
- Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has 24% less fat (7.6 g vs 10 g).
- Only Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise lists: Fish, Gluten.
Ingredients
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise
Not available.
Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise
Filets de _poisson_ _colin_ de l'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) 75 %, eau, huile de colza, farine de _blé_, vin blanc, sel de cuisine, persil, épices, fécule modifiée de pommes de terre, sucre, condiment, glucose, levure, acidifiant: acide citrique, jus de citron, épaississant: gomme guar, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise or Filets gourmet à la Bordelaise?
Overall, Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 168 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'Alaska à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.