Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise vs Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise
Overall, Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d'alaska a la bordelai... | Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelai... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 9.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 2.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 5.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has 22% less fat (7.6 g vs 9.8 g).
- Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has 41% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 2.9 g).
- Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has 61% more protein (14 g vs 5.4 g).
- Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise
Not available.
Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise or Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise?
Overall, Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d'alaska a la bordelaise has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.