Colas de Rape del Cabo vs Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Overall, Colas de Rape del Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colas de Rape del Cabo | Queue de lotte de chine sans... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colas de Rape del Cabo has 18% fewer calories (56 kcal vs 68 kcal).
- Colas de Rape del Cabo has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 11% more protein (14.6 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Colas de Rape del Cabo
Not available.
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colas de Rape del Cabo or Queue de lotte de chine sans peau?
Overall, Colas de Rape del Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colas de Rape del Cabo has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colas de Rape del Cabo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.