Queues de Lotte de Chine vs Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Queues de Lotte de Chine | Queue de lotte de chine sans... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Queues de Lotte de Chine has no sugar, while Queue de lotte de chine sans peau has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Queues de Lotte de Chine
Not available.
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Queues de Lotte de Chine or Queue de lotte de chine sans peau?
Overall, Queues de Lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queues de Lotte de Chine has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queues de Lotte de Chine has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.