Queues de lotte de Chine vs Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Overall, Queues de lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Queues de lotte de Chine
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Queues de lotte de Chine | Queue de lotte de chine sans... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 68 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 14.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Queues de lotte de Chine has 13% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 68 kcal).
Ingredients
Queues de lotte de Chine
INGREDÊ èlT&s INGREDIËNTEN - INGREDIPNTI OLOtte de Chine (LophiUS /itU/on). Pêchée chalut en océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest. 10 n061. Surgelée êRape de China (lophiUS /itU/on), Pescado con redes de arrostre en el Océano Pacifico loroeste, FAO 1106 1. Congelodo. ozeeduivel (lophius /itU/on), gevangen met een sleepnet in het noordwesten von de tille Oceoon. FAO n06 1. Diepgevroren. ORospo dello Cino (lophiUS /itU/on)/ pescoto con a strosclco ne1110ceono Pacifico ordocddentole. FAO n06 1. Surgeloto. DÉCONGÉLATION - DESCONGELACIÔN
Queue de lotte de chine sans peau
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Queues de lotte de Chine or Queue de lotte de chine sans peau?
Overall, Queues de lotte de Chine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Queues de lotte de Chine has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 68 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queues de lotte de Chine has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.