Colas de Rape del Cabo vs Queues de lotte de Chine
Overall, Colas de Rape del Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colas de Rape del Cabo | Queues de lotte de Chine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 56 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colas de Rape del Cabo has 80% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Colas de Rape del Cabo
Not available.
Queues de lotte de Chine
INGREDÊ èlT&s INGREDIËNTEN - INGREDIPNTI OLOtte de Chine (LophiUS /itU/on). Pêchée chalut en océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest. 10 n061. Surgelée êRape de China (lophiUS /itU/on), Pescado con redes de arrostre en el Océano Pacifico loroeste, FAO 1106 1. Congelodo. ozeeduivel (lophius /itU/on), gevangen met een sleepnet in het noordwesten von de tille Oceoon. FAO n06 1. Diepgevroren. ORospo dello Cino (lophiUS /itU/on)/ pescoto con a strosclco ne1110ceono Pacifico ordocddentole. FAO n06 1. Surgeloto. DÉCONGÉLATION - DESCONGELACIÔN
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colas de Rape del Cabo or Queues de lotte de Chine?
Overall, Colas de Rape del Cabo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colas de Rape del Cabo has fewer calories: 56 kcal versus 59 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colas de Rape del Cabo has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.