Cocktail vs Luncheon Meat
Overall, Cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cocktail | Luncheon Meat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 150 kcal | 280 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 8.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocktail has 46% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 280 kcal).
- Cocktail has 57% less fat (10 g vs 23 g).
- Cocktail has 51% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 8.4 g).
- Cocktail has no sugar, while Luncheon Meat has 0.3 g.
- Luncheon Meat has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Cocktail has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cocktail
sausages: 45% mechanically separated pork, 35% pork, water, beef collagen, potato starch, salt, smoke aroma, stabilizer (e451), antioxygen (e30], natural aromas, shuttle oil, preservative (e250), rosemary extract, brine: water,
Luncheon Meat
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cocktail or Luncheon Meat?
Overall, Cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocktail has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 280 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocktail has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.