Herta Knacki original bel vs Cocktail
Overall, Cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Herta Knacki original bel | Cocktail |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 150 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 4.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | Celery, Gluten, Milk, Pork | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocktail has 44% fewer calories (150 kcal vs 269 kcal).
- Cocktail has 57% less fat (10 g vs 23 g).
- Cocktail has 54% less saturated fat (4.1 g vs 9 g).
- Cocktail has no sugar, while Herta Knacki original bel has 2 g.
- Herta Knacki original bel has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
- Cocktail has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Herta Knacki original bel lists: Celery, Gluten, Milk, Pork.
Ingredients
Herta Knacki original bel
pork, water, pork fat, lactoserum (lactose), salt, milk protein 0,8%, yeast, wheat fiber, corn dextrose, flavors (celery, gluten), pea protein, colors (carmine, paprika extract), preservative (sodium nitrite), antioxidant (sodium isoascorbate), ferments, smoke,
Cocktail
sausages: 45% mechanically separated pork, 35% pork, water, beef collagen, potato starch, salt, smoke aroma, stabilizer (e451), antioxygen (e30], natural aromas, shuttle oil, preservative (e250), rosemary extract, brine: water,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Herta Knacki original bel or Cocktail?
Overall, Cocktail has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cocktail has fewer calories: 150 kcal versus 269 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocktail has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.