Comparison
Cocco essiccato vs Kokosbrood
Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cocco essiccato | Kokosbrood |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 693 kcal | 413 kcal |
| Fat | 65 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 59 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 5.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokosbrood has 40% fewer calories (413 kcal vs 693 kcal).
- Kokosbrood has 78% less fat (14 g vs 65 g).
- Kokosbrood has 78% less saturated fat (13 g vs 59 g).
- Cocco essiccato has 88% less sugar (5.2 g vs 42 g).
- Cocco essiccato has 50% more fiber (11 g vs 5.5 g).
- Cocco essiccato has 51% more protein (5.5 g vs 2.7 g).
- Cocco essiccato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cocco essiccato is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Kokosbrood lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cocco essiccato
100% cocco essiccato
Kokosbrood
Kokos 28%, glucose-fructosestroop, glutenvrij tarwezetmeel, dextrose, suiker, gelatine
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cocco essiccato or Kokosbrood?
Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokosbrood has fewer calories: 413 kcal versus 693 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocco essiccato has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 42 g per 100 g.