Comparison
Kokos geraspelt vs Cocco essiccato
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos geraspelt | Cocco essiccato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 660 kcal | 693 kcal |
| Fat | 63 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 55 g | 59 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocco essiccato has 19% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.4 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has 45% more fiber (20 g vs 11 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has 11% more protein (6.2 g vs 5.5 g).
Ingredients
Kokos geraspelt
Kokos geraspelt
Cocco essiccato
100% cocco essiccato
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos geraspelt or Cocco essiccato?
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos geraspelt has fewer calories: 660 kcal versus 693 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocco essiccato has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Dessicated Coconut vs Cocco essiccato
Kokos geraspelt vs Dessicated Coconut
Noix de Coco Cube vs Cocco essiccato
Noix de Coco Cube vs Kokos geraspelt
Kokos geraspelt vs Dedicated Coconut
Kokos geraspelt vs Cocco grattugiato
Kokos geraspelt vs Lamelles de coco / Kokos...
Dedicated Coconut vs Cocco essiccato