Comparison

Kokos geraspelt vs Cocco grattugiato

Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKokos geraspeltCocco grattugiato
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 660 kcal 633 kcal
Fat 63 g 62 g
Saturated fat 55 g 55 g
Sugars 6.4 g 6.4 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 20 g 14 g
Protein 6.2 g 5.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kokos geraspelt has 30% more fiber (20 g vs 14 g).

Ingredients

Kokos geraspelt

Kokos geraspelt

Cocco grattugiato

cocco grattugiato

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kokos geraspelt or Cocco grattugiato?

Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cocco grattugiato has fewer calories: 633 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kokos geraspelt has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons