Kokos geraspelt vs Lamelles de coco / Kokosschnitze
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos geraspelt | Lamelles de coco / Kokosschn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 660 kcal | 655 kcal |
| Fat | 63 g | 64 g |
| Saturated fat | 55 g | 55 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | 14 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos geraspelt has 30% more fiber (20 g vs 14 g).
- Kokos geraspelt has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kokos geraspelt
Kokos geraspelt
Lamelles de coco / Kokosschnitze
Noix de coco séchée bio (prove - nance: voir date). Les noix de coco ont été cultivées par des producteurs Fairtrade, et cer - des et commercialisées selon les standards du commerce équitable Fairtrade. 100% du poids total. Pour en savoir plus: code Fairtrade 1028499. www.fairtrademaxhavelaar.ch DAT mindestens haltbar bis: à consommer préf. av: Ghana 03.03.2024 L1489465 07:23 Unter Schutzatmosphäre verpackt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos geraspelt or Lamelles de coco / Kokosschnitze?
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lamelles de coco / Kokosschnitze has fewer calories: 655 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lamelles de coco / Kokosschnitze has less sugar: 6 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.