Kokos geraspelt vs Dedicated Coconut
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos geraspelt | Dedicated Coconut |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 660 kcal | 633 kcal |
| Fat | 63 g | 62 g |
| Saturated fat | 55 g | 53 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 20 g | — |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos geraspelt has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokos geraspelt is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Dedicated Coconut lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kokos geraspelt
Kokos geraspelt
Dedicated Coconut
desiccated coconut, preservative (sulphur dioxide)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos geraspelt or Dedicated Coconut?
Overall, Kokos geraspelt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dedicated Coconut has fewer calories: 633 kcal versus 660 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos geraspelt has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.