Dessicated Coconut vs Cocco essiccato
Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dessicated Coconut | Cocco essiccato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 640 kcal | 693 kcal |
| Fat | 62 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 53.4 g | 59 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 5.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 13.4 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cocco essiccato has 19% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.4 g).
- Dessicated Coconut has 18% more fiber (13.4 g vs 11 g).
- Cocco essiccato has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cocco essiccato is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Dessicated Coconut lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Dessicated Coconut
Desiccated Coconut, Preservatives: Sulphur Dioxide.
Cocco essiccato
100% cocco essiccato
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dessicated Coconut or Cocco essiccato?
Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dessicated Coconut has fewer calories: 640 kcal versus 693 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cocco essiccato has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.