Comparison

Dessicated Coconut vs Cocco essiccato

Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDessicated CoconutCocco essiccato
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 640 kcal 693 kcal
Fat 62 g 65 g
Saturated fat 53.4 g 59 g
Sugars 6.4 g 5.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 13.4 g 11 g
Protein 5.6 g 5.5 g
Additives10
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cocco essiccato has 19% less sugar (5.2 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Dessicated Coconut has 18% more fiber (13.4 g vs 11 g).
  • Cocco essiccato has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Cocco essiccato is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Dessicated Coconut lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Dessicated Coconut

Desiccated Coconut, Preservatives: Sulphur Dioxide.

Cocco essiccato

100% cocco essiccato

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dessicated Coconut or Cocco essiccato?

Overall, Cocco essiccato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dessicated Coconut has fewer calories: 640 kcal versus 693 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cocco essiccato has less sugar: 5.2 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons