Comparison

Ciabatta zum Aufbacken vs CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits

Overall, Ciabatta zum Aufbacken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCiabatta zum AufbackenCIABATTINE - Petits pavés pr...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 271 kcal 231 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 3.3 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.6 g
Sugars 2.9 g 3.9 g
Salt 1.2 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 6.8 g
Protein 7.7 g 4.6 g
Additives33
AllergensGlutenSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits has 15% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 271 kcal).
  • Ciabatta zum Aufbacken has 26% less sugar (2.9 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Ciabatta zum Aufbacken has 40% more protein (7.7 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Only Ciabatta zum Aufbacken lists: Gluten.
  • Only CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Ciabatta zum Aufbacken

Weizenmehl, Wasser, Sauerteig (Wasser, Weizenmehl), Hartweizengrieß, natives Olivenöl extra, Roggenmehl, Meersalz, Hefe, Säureregulator: Natriumacetate; Weizenmalzmehl, Emulgator: Mono - und Diacetylweinsäureester von Mono - und Diglyceriden von Speisefettsäuren, Lecithine.

CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits

water/water, corn starch/corn starch, corn flour, apple/apple fibers, rice flour, yeast/yeast, dextrose, soy protein, sunflower oil, thickener/thickener: hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, salt, acids: citric acid and tartaric acid,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ciabatta zum Aufbacken or CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits?

Overall, Ciabatta zum Aufbacken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

CIABATTINE - Petits pavés précuits has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 271 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ciabatta zum Aufbacken has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons