Ciabatta Rolls vs Metro Rolls Italian Style
Overall, Ciabatta Rolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ciabatta Rolls | Metro Rolls Italian Style |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 482 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 5.8 g | 2.7 g |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Metro Rolls Italian Style has 48% fewer calories (251 kcal vs 482 kcal).
- Metro Rolls Italian Style has 66% less fat (1.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Metro Rolls Italian Style has 50% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Ciabatta Rolls has 32% less sugar (5 g vs 7.4 g).
- Ciabatta Rolls has 53% more fiber (5.8 g vs 2.7 g).
- Ciabatta Rolls has 55% more protein (18.8 g vs 8.4 g).
- Ciabatta Rolls has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ciabatta Rolls
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, EXTRA VIRGIN OLIVE OIL (3%), Fermented Wheat Flour, Malted Wheat Flour, Salt, Yeast.
Metro Rolls Italian Style
Wheat Flour (Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin), Water, Semolina (Wheat), Sugar, Fermented Wheat Flour, Rapeseed Oil, Salt, Yeast, Palm Oil, Flour Treatment Agent: Ascorbic Acid.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ciabatta Rolls or Metro Rolls Italian Style?
Overall, Ciabatta Rolls has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Metro Rolls Italian Style has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciabatta Rolls has less sugar: 5 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.