Chutney - Mango vs Branston small chunk piccalilli
Overall, Branston small chunk piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chutney - Mango | Branston small chunk piccali... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 24 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Branston small chunk piccalilli has 13% less sugar (21 g vs 24 g).
- Branston small chunk piccalilli has 38% more protein (0.8 g vs 0.5 g).
- Only Branston small chunk piccalilli lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Chutney - Mango
Wasser, 33 % Mango-Paste (Zucker, 15 % Mango, Branntweinessig, Salz, Gewürze), 12 % Mango, Zucker, modifizierte Stärke, Speisesalz, Branntweinessig, Gewürze, Stärke, Petersilie.
Branston small chunk piccalilli
Vegetables (38%) (Cauliflower, Silverskin Onion, Gherkin), Water, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Salt, Modified Maize Starch, Rice Flour, Mustard Flour, Spices (Ground Turmeric, Ground Ginger, Ground Pepper), Colour (Riboflavin), Cinnamon Extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chutney - Mango or Branston small chunk piccalilli?
Overall, Branston small chunk piccalilli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Branston small chunk piccalilli has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Branston small chunk piccalilli has less sugar: 21 g versus 24 g per 100 g.