Chrzan vs Chrzan Staropolski
Overall, Chrzan Staropolski has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chrzan | Chrzan Staropolski |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 157 kcal | 171 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 9.5 g | 8.3 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Milk, Mustard, Pirosiarczyn sodu |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chrzan Staropolski has 13% less sugar (8.3 g vs 9.5 g).
- Chrzan Staropolski has 32% less salt (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Chrzan is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chrzan lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Chrzan Staropolski lists: Milk, Pirosiarczyn sodu.
Ingredients
Chrzan
Korzeń chrzanu 60%, woda, olej rzepakowy, ocet spirytusowy, cukier, sól, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), przeciwutleniacz (E223).
Chrzan Staropolski
54% korzeń chrzanu tarty (zawiera przeciwutleniacz: pirosiarczyn sodu), woda, olej rzepakowy, ocet spirytusowy, cukier, sól, _mleko_ w proszku pełne, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), substancje zagęszczające (guma ksantanowa, guma guar), słodka serwatka w proszku (z _mleka_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chrzan or Chrzan Staropolski?
Overall, Chrzan Staropolski has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chrzan has fewer calories: 157 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chrzan Staropolski has less sugar: 8.3 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.