Chrzan Staropolski vs Chrzan tarty
Overall, Chrzan tarty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chrzan Staropolski | Chrzan tarty |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 171 kcal | 124 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 8.3 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 4.1 g | — |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Additives | 4 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk, Mustard, Pirosiarczyn sodu | Milk, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites, Pirosiarczyn sodu |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chrzan tarty has 27% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 171 kcal).
- Chrzan tarty has 47% less fat (5.3 g vs 10 g).
- Chrzan tarty has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Chrzan tarty has 13% less sugar (7.2 g vs 8.3 g).
- Chrzan tarty is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Chrzan tarty lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Chrzan Staropolski
54% korzeń chrzanu tarty (zawiera przeciwutleniacz: pirosiarczyn sodu), woda, olej rzepakowy, ocet spirytusowy, cukier, sól, _mleko_ w proszku pełne, regulator kwasowości (kwas cytrynowy), substancje zagęszczające (guma ksantanowa, guma guar), słodka serwatka w proszku (z _mleka_).
Chrzan tarty
korzeń chrzanu (52%), woda, cukier, olej roślinny rzepakowy, regulator kwasowości - kwas cytrynowy, sól, _mleko_ w proszku, substancja konserwująca: _pirosiarczyn sodu_ - E223.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chrzan Staropolski or Chrzan tarty?
Overall, Chrzan tarty has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chrzan tarty has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chrzan tarty has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.