Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema vs Bruinbrood
Overall, Bruinbrood has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema
Bruinbrood
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chrupki kukurydziane w polew... | Bruinbrood |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 557 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 34.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 33 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 45.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 4.6 g | 9.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bruinbrood has 57% fewer calories (239 kcal vs 557 kcal).
- Bruinbrood has 95% less fat (1.8 g vs 34.8 g).
- Bruinbrood has 99% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 33 g).
- Bruinbrood has 97% less sugar (1.2 g vs 45.8 g).
- Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Bruinbrood has 51% more protein (9.4 g vs 4.6 g).
- Bruinbrood has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Bruinbrood lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema
Not available.
Bruinbrood
Water, volkorenTARWEmeel, TARWEbloem, bakkersgist, moutmeel (GERST, TARWE), bakkerszout, TARWEgluten, enzymen (TARWE), meelverbeteraar: E300, raapzaadolie, geïnactiveerd TARWEdesempoeder, emulgator: raapzaadlecithine, E = door de EU goedgekeurde hulpstof.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chrupki kukurydziane w polewie mlecznej Stema or Bruinbrood?
Overall, Bruinbrood has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bruinbrood has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 557 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bruinbrood has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 45.8 g per 100 g.