Choux de choucroute vs Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel
Overall, Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Choux de choucroute | Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 24 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 1.2 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has 25% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 24 kcal).
- Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has no sugar, while Choux de choucroute has 3.1 g.
- Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has 25% less salt (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Choux de choucroute
Not available.
Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel
98% repollo", sal marina, ácido citrico, antioxidante (ácido ascórbico). "Van biologische oorsprong/ aus biologischem Ap d'agriculture organic VOEDINGSWAAR energie/Bren NUTRITIONELLE INFORMACION energy/valor vetten/Fett/ fat/grasas wx. verzadige gesättigt/do saturated/de koolhydraten glucides/cart carbohidratos w.x. suikers/e dont sucres/ de los cuales a vezels/Ballasts alimentaires/f eiwitten/Eiweit protein/protein zout/Salz/sela
FAQ
Which is healthier: Choux de choucroute or Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel?
Overall, Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rauwe Zuurkool Naturel has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.