Comparison

Choucroute cuite au riesling vs Choucroute au naturel

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoucroute cuite au rieslingChoucroute au naturel
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 44 kcal 16 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 0.2 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.9 g 1 g
Fiber 3 g 2 g
Protein 0.6 g 1 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choucroute au naturel has 64% fewer calories (16 kcal vs 44 kcal).
  • Choucroute au naturel has 94% less fat (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has no saturated fat, while Choucroute cuite au riesling has 0.9 g.
  • Choucroute cuite au riesling has 63% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Choucroute cuite au riesling has 33% more fiber (3 g vs 2 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has 40% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Choucroute au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Choucroute au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Choucroute cuite au riesling

Choucroute (chou, sel), saindoux, Riesling AOC, épices, arôme naturel. sel, baies de genievre, antioxydant: acide ascorbique.

Choucroute au naturel

Choucroute* (chou*, sel marin), eau, sel marin, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. *Produits issus de l'agriculture biologique. Souligné : origine France (100% des ingrédients agricoles bio).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choucroute cuite au riesling or Choucroute au naturel?

Overall, Choucroute au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Choucroute au naturel has fewer calories: 16 kcal versus 44 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Choucroute cuite au riesling has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons