Comparison
Chou de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK
Overall, Chou de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou de Bruxelles | Rosenkohl TK |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 2.6 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou de Bruxelles has 92% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Chou de Bruxelles has 42% less sugar (1.7 g vs 3 g).
- Chou de Bruxelles has 19% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Rosenkohl TK has 12% more protein (2.9 g vs 2.6 g).
Ingredients
Chou de Bruxelles
choux de Bruxelles
Rosenkohl TK
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou de Bruxelles or Rosenkohl TK?
Overall, Chou de Bruxelles has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chou de Bruxelles has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou de Bruxelles has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 3 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Chou de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK
Chou de Bruxelles vs Choux de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles minut... vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de bruxelles crème... vs Chou de Bruxelles
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK
Choux de Bruxelles vs Rosenkohl TK