Comparison

Chocolate Granola vs Smurfs

Overall, Smurfs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolate GranolaSmurfs
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 406 kcal 332 kcal
Fat 14.1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 7.8 g 0.1 g
Sugars 14.1 g 43 g
Salt 0.8 g 0 g
Fiber 14.1 g —
Protein 25 g 6.6 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedGelatin

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Smurfs has 18% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 406 kcal).
  • Smurfs has 96% less fat (0.5 g vs 14.1 g).
  • Smurfs has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Chocolate Granola has 67% less sugar (14.1 g vs 43 g).
  • Smurfs has 96% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Chocolate Granola has 74% more protein (25 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Chocolate Granola is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Smurfs lists: Gelatin.

Ingredients

Chocolate Granola

Almond milk, fat, sterol, dimagnesium, total carbohydrates, dietary fiber, total sugars, protein, vitamin D, calcium.

Smurfs

glucose syrup, sugar, gelatin, dextrose, acidifier : citric acid, flavourings, colours : carmine dyes, patent blue v, lutein, coating agents : beeswax, carnauba wax,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolate Granola or Smurfs?

Overall, Smurfs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smurfs has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 406 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolate Granola has less sugar: 14.1 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons