Smurfs vs Dark chocolate
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Smurfs | Dark chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 614 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 32 g |
| Sugars | 43 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 13 g |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gelatin | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Smurfs has 46% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 614 kcal).
- Smurfs has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 52 g).
- Smurfs has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 32 g).
- Dark chocolate has 82% less sugar (7.8 g vs 43 g).
- Dark chocolate has 45% more protein (12 g vs 6.6 g).
- Dark chocolate is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Smurfs lists: Gelatin.
Ingredients
Smurfs
glucose syrup, sugar, gelatin, dextrose, acidifier : citric acid, flavourings, colours : carmine dyes, patent blue v, lutein, coating agents : beeswax, carnauba wax,
Dark chocolate
Pasta di cacao (prodotta in Italia con cacao proveniente dal Perù), burro di cacao, cacao magro in polvere, zucchero, estratto di vaniglia.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Smurfs or Dark chocolate?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Smurfs has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 614 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dark chocolate has less sugar: 7.8 g versus 43 g per 100 g.