Comparison

Chocolat noir Equateur Bio vs Edelbitter Mild 90%

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat noir Equateur BioEdelbitter Mild 90%
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 639 kcal 593 kcal
Fat 55.3 g 50 g
Saturated fat 34 g 30.2 g
Sugars 14 g 7.4 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 11.5 g 15.3 g
Protein 9 g 11.5 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 11% less saturated fat (30.2 g vs 34 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 47% less sugar (7.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 25% more fiber (15.3 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 22% more protein (11.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Chocolat noir Equateur Bio is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Edelbitter Mild 90% lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolat noir Equateur Bio

Pâte de cacao 50%, beurre de cacao 35%, sucre, extrait de vanille

Edelbitter Mild 90%

Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Zucker, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Milch enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat noir Equateur Bio or Edelbitter Mild 90%?

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 639 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons