Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar vs Edelbitter Mild 90%
Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar
Edelbitter Mild 90%
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar | Edelbitter Mild 90% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 615 kcal | 593 kcal |
| Fat | 51 g | 50 g |
| Saturated fat | 31 g | 30.2 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 7.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 15.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edelbitter Mild 90% has 47% less sugar (7.4 g vs 14 g).
- Edelbitter Mild 90% has 28% more fiber (15.3 g vs 11 g).
- Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Edelbitter Mild 90% lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar
Pâte de cacao de Madagascar 75%, sucre de canne, beurre de cacao 10%
Edelbitter Mild 90%
Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Zucker, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Milch enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat noir 85% Madagascar or Edelbitter Mild 90%?
Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edelbitter Mild 90% has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 615 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Edelbitter Mild 90% has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 14 g per 100 g.