Comparison

Edelbitter Mild 90% vs Chocolat Bio noir 85%

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEdelbitter Mild 90%Chocolat Bio noir 85%
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 593 kcal 607 kcal
Fat 50 g 50 g
Saturated fat 30.2 g 30 g
Sugars 7.4 g 14 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 15.3 g 13 g
Protein 11.5 g 10 g
Additives10
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 47% less sugar (7.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 15% more fiber (15.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 13% more protein (11.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Chocolat Bio noir 85% is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Edelbitter Mild 90% lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Edelbitter Mild 90%

Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Zucker, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Milch enthalten.

Chocolat Bio noir 85%

Pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, cacao maigre en poudre, sucre de canne, extrait de vanille. Peut contenir fruits à coque et lait

FAQ

Which is healthier: Edelbitter Mild 90% or Chocolat Bio noir 85%?

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 607 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons