Comparison

Edelbitter Mild 90% vs Noir 86% Extra intense

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEdelbitter Mild 90%Noir 86% Extra intense
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 593 kcal 645 kcal
Fat 50 g 56 g
Saturated fat 30.2 g 35 g
Sugars 7.4 g 13 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 15.3 g 13 g
Protein 11.5 g 8.5 g
Additives12
AllergensSoybeansMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 11% less fat (50 g vs 56 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 14% less saturated fat (30.2 g vs 35 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 43% less sugar (7.4 g vs 13 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 15% more fiber (15.3 g vs 13 g).
  • Edelbitter Mild 90% has 26% more protein (11.5 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Only Noir 86% Extra intense lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Edelbitter Mild 90%

Kakaomasse, Kakaobutter, fettarmes Kakaopulver, Zucker, Emulgator: Lecithine (Soja); Vanilleextrakt. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten und Milch enthalten.

Noir 86% Extra intense

Pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, cacao maigre en poudre, sucre, arôme naturel de vainille, émulsifiant (lécithines de _soja_), _lait_ écrémé en poudre.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Edelbitter Mild 90% or Noir 86% Extra intense?

Overall, Edelbitter Mild 90% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has fewer calories: 593 kcal versus 645 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Edelbitter Mild 90% has less sugar: 7.4 g versus 13 g per 100 g.

More comparisons