Chocolat céréales vs Aros avena cacao
Overall, Chocolat céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chocolat céréales | Aros avena cacao |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 85 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 7.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 9.1 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 13.5 g |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocolat céréales has 76% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 360 kcal).
- Chocolat céréales has 72% less fat (2 g vs 7.2 g).
- Chocolat céréales has 25% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Chocolat céréales has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 9.1 g).
- Aros avena cacao has 86% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Chocolat céréales has 28% more protein (12.7 g vs 9.1 g).
- Only Aros avena cacao lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Chocolat céréales
Not available.
Aros avena cacao
(ES) Harina integral de avena (gluten) (78%), sémola de maíz, azúcar, cacao (5,5%), sal, aroma y antioxidantes (extracto rico en toco - feroles). (PT) Farinha integral de aveia (gluten) (78%), sêmola de milho, açucar, cacau (5,5%), sal, aroma e antioxidantes (extrato rico em toco - feróis). (EN) Whole oat flour (gluten) (78%), corn se - molina, sugar, cocoa (5,5%), salt, aroma and antioxidants (extract rich in tocopherols).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chocolat céréales or Aros avena cacao?
Overall, Chocolat céréales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolat céréales has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocolat céréales has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 9.1 g per 100 g.