Comparison

Chocoladeletter Melk S vs Speculaas molens

Overall, Speculaas molens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocoladeletter Melk SSpeculaas molens
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 531 kcal 507 kcal
Fat 29.3 g 24.8 g
Saturated fat 17.7 g 13.2 g
Sugars 57.5 g 29.2 g
Salt 0.3 g 1.2 g
Fiber 2.3 g 2.6 g
Protein 6 g 6.9 g
Additives00
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Speculaas molens has 15% less fat (24.8 g vs 29.3 g).
  • Speculaas molens has 25% less saturated fat (13.2 g vs 17.7 g).
  • Speculaas molens has 49% less sugar (29.2 g vs 57.5 g).
  • Chocoladeletter Melk S has 77% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Speculaas molens has 12% more fiber (2.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Speculaas molens has 13% more protein (6.9 g vs 6 g).
  • Only Chocoladeletter Melk S lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocoladeletter Melk S

Suiker, cacaoboter', volle MELKpoeder, cacaomassa', lactose (MELK), weipoeder (MELK) (vegeta - risch), emulgator: SOJAlecithine, natuurlijk vanille-aroma.

Speculaas molens

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocoladeletter Melk S or Speculaas molens?

Overall, Speculaas molens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Speculaas molens has fewer calories: 507 kcal versus 531 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Speculaas molens has less sugar: 29.2 g versus 57.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons