Comparison

Choco duo vs H

Overall, H has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChoco duoH
Nutri-Score — d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 558 kcal 75 kcal
Fat 34.4 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 1.1 g
Sugars 55.8 g 9.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1.8 g 0 g
Protein 4.5 g 3.6 g
Additives11
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • H has 87% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 558 kcal).
  • H has 95% less fat (1.8 g vs 34.4 g).
  • H has 84% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 6.8 g).
  • H has 82% less sugar (9.9 g vs 55.8 g).
  • Choco duo has 100% more fiber (1.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Choco duo has 20% more protein (4.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Only Choco duo lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Choco duo

S Cena de cacao y leche desnatada con aromaa limón, Sn hngedientes: azúcar, aceite de nabina, aceite de palma sostenible aede desnatada en polvo, suero lácteo en polvo, 4,2% cacao desgrasa0 s, emugente: lecitinas: aromas, * Certificado Rainforest Aliance ty e dovs fnutos de cáscara, Conservar a a temperatura ambiente (ente tyZ ge preferentemente antes s del ALM Cocos iPensando hoy en nuestro matana A adquirir este producto eti p)je Junto con Lid, el progama de an Allance, que tiene como obietivg lome una agricultura justa y repeuoa tE medio ambiente, wwwaog id Supermercados SAU, Pol, Ind, El Salbdar

H

sugar, maltodextrin, natural flavourings, natural colour (beetroot red), vitamins (c, thiamin, d), minerals (iron, zinc), may contain soya, gluten free

FAQ

Which is healthier: Choco duo or H?

Overall, H has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

H has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 558 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

H has less sugar: 9.9 g versus 55.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons