Comparison

Chips d'algues wasabi vs Roasted Seaweed Snack

Overall, Chips d'algues wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChips d'algues wasabiRoasted Seaweed Snack
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 593 kcal 447 kcal
Fat 39 g 50.4 g
Saturated fat 3.6 g 6.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 3 g 27.5 g
Fiber 21 g 10.4 g
Protein 24 g 3.5 g
Additives00
AllergensMustard, MoutardeSesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has 25% fewer calories (447 kcal vs 593 kcal).
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has 23% less fat (39 g vs 50.4 g).
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has 47% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Roasted Seaweed Snack has no sugar, while Chips d'algues wasabi has 0.5 g.
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has 89% less salt (3 g vs 27.5 g).
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has 51% more fiber (21 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has 85% more protein (24 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Chips d'algues wasabi has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chips d'algues wasabi lists: Mustard, Moutarde.
  • Only Roasted Seaweed Snack lists: Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Chips d'algues wasabi

Algues nori (Porphyra yezoensis) 57,8%, huile de tournesol, wasabi 3% (moutarde, poudre de wasabi 0,02%), sel marin. Pourcentages exprimés sur le produit fini Peut contenir des traces de graines de sésam.

Roasted Seaweed Snack

varech, huile de sésame, huile de maïs, sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chips d'algues wasabi or Roasted Seaweed Snack?

Overall, Chips d'algues wasabi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Roasted Seaweed Snack has fewer calories: 447 kcal versus 593 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Roasted Seaweed Snack has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons