Comparison

Chili con carne vs Bulgur e Quinoa

Overall, Bulgur e Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChili con carneBulgur e Quinoa
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 91 kcal 352 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.6 g
Sugars 1.8 g 3.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0 g
Fiber 4 g 9 g
Protein 6.6 g 12 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chili con carne has 74% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Bulgur e Quinoa has 45% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Chili con carne has 49% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Bulgur e Quinoa has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Bulgur e Quinoa has 56% more fiber (9 g vs 4 g).
  • Bulgur e Quinoa has 45% more protein (12 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Bulgur e Quinoa has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Bulgur e Quinoa is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Bulgur e Quinoa lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Chili con carne

Eau, haricots rouges trempés 30%, viande bovine précuite 10,5%, double concentré de tomates, tomates 4,2%, poivrons rouges 3,6%, carottes 3,6%, maïs doux 2,9%, oignons 1,8%, épices (dont piments 0,07%), sel, amidon modifié de maïs, sucre, arôme naturel, origan, arôme naturel d'ail, affermissant: chlorure de calcium. Pourcentages exprimés par rapport au poids net total. Elaboré à partir de viande bovine origine France.

Bulgur e Quinoa

grano duro (80%), quinoa rossa (20%).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chili con carne or Bulgur e Quinoa?

Overall, Bulgur e Quinoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chili con carne has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chili con carne has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons