Chickpea + Tomato + Onion vs Chilibonen
Overall, Chilibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chickpea + Tomato + Onion | Chilibonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 132 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chilibonen has 36% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 132 kcal).
- Chilibonen has 90% less fat (0.8 g vs 7.4 g).
- Chilibonen has 47% more fiber (5.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Chilibonen has 26% more protein (5 g vs 3.7 g).
- Chilibonen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chickpea + Tomato + Onion lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Chickpea + Tomato + Onion
Kabuli Chana* (Water, Chickpeas), Water, Tomatoes in Juice" (Tomatoes*, Tomato Juice*, Calcium Chloride, Citric Acid), Onion", Sunflower Or, Tomato Paste*, Chickpea Flour*, Garlic, Ginger*, Coriander, Cumin, Sea Salt, Brown Mustard Seed*, Turmeric, Cumin Seed", Dried Cilantro, Black Pepper, Lemon Juice Concentrate*, Cayenne*. "Organically Grown and Processed CREATED AND
Chilibonen
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chickpea + Tomato + Onion or Chilibonen?
Overall, Chilibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilibonen has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 132 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chickpea + Tomato + Onion has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3 g per 100 g.