Tomato Cannellini Beanz vs Chilibonen
Overall, Chilibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tomato Cannellini Beanz | Chilibonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chilibonen has 11% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 96 kcal).
- Chilibonen has 80% less fat (0.8 g vs 3.7 g).
- Tomato Cannellini Beanz has 40% less sugar (1.8 g vs 3 g).
- Chilibonen has 31% more fiber (5.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Tomato Cannellini Beanz lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Tomato Cannellini Beanz
Cannellini Beans (39%), Water, Tomato Paste (7%), Tomatoes in Tomato Juice (6%, Tomatoes, Concentrated Tomato Juice), Carrot, Rapeseed Oil, Onion (3%), Celery, Garlic Puree (2%), Cornflour, Basil, Salt, Parsley, Dried Onion (0.2%), Black Pepper.
Chilibonen
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tomato Cannellini Beanz or Chilibonen?
Overall, Chilibonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chilibonen has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tomato Cannellini Beanz has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 3 g per 100 g.