Comparison

Chia good kaakao vs Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce

Overall, Chia good kaakao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChia good kaakaoChia pudink s rozvarem z les...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 127 kcal 178 kcal
Fat 9.5 g 10.7 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 6.1 g
Sugars 0.7 g 14 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 4.1 g —
Protein 3.1 g 3.7 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chia good kaakao has 29% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 178 kcal).
  • Chia good kaakao has 11% less fat (9.5 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Chia good kaakao has 95% less sugar (0.7 g vs 14 g).
  • Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce has 16% more protein (3.7 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Chia good kaakao has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chia good kaakao

VESI, KOOKOSMAITO, CHIA* 10%, MAKEUTUSAINE ERYTRITOLI", KAAKAOJAUHE* 2%, SITRUUNATAYSMEHUTIIVISTE*, LUONTAISET AROMIT, MERISUOLA.

Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce

Kokosový nápoj (kokosový extrakt 71%, pitná voda, zahušťovadlo: xanthan; emulgátor: E435), sójový nápoj (pitná voda, sójové boby 13,5%, mořská jedlá sůl), agávový sirup, chia semínka 9,9 % (Salvia hispanica), rozvar z lesního ovoce 9,9% [lesní ovoce 71% (černý rybíz 50%, červený rybíz 30%, jahody 10%, ostružiny 5%, malin 5 %), cukr]], kokosové plátky 1,5%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chia good kaakao or Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce?

Overall, Chia good kaakao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chia good kaakao has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chia good kaakao has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons