Chia good vs Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce
Overall, Chia good has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Chia good
Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chia good | Chia pudink s rozvarem z les... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 110 kcal | 178 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 10.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.4 g | 6.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | — |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 3.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chia good has 38% fewer calories (110 kcal vs 178 kcal).
- Chia good has 87% less sugar (1.8 g vs 14 g).
- Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce has 38% more protein (3.7 g vs 2.3 g).
- Chia good has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Chia good
KOOKOSVESI, VESI, KOOKOSMAITO, CHIA 10%, SITRUUNA 6%, MAKEUTUSAINE ERYTRITOLI", SITRUUNATAYSMEHUTIIVISTE 1%, LUONTAISET AROMIT, MERISUOLA.
Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce
Kokosový nápoj (kokosový extrakt 71%, pitná voda, zahušťovadlo: xanthan; emulgátor: E435), sójový nápoj (pitná voda, sójové boby 13,5%, mořská jedlá sůl), agávový sirup, chia semínka 9,9 % (Salvia hispanica), rozvar z lesního ovoce 9,9% [lesní ovoce 71% (černý rybíz 50%, červený rybíz 30%, jahody 10%, ostružiny 5%, malin 5 %), cukr]], kokosové plátky 1,5%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chia good or Chia pudink s rozvarem z lesního ovoce?
Overall, Chia good has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chia good has fewer calories: 110 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chia good has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 14 g per 100 g.