Comparison

Cherries and berries squash vs Double Concentrate Apple Litres

Overall, Double Concentrate Apple Litres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCherries and berries squashDouble Concentrate Apple Lit...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 2 kcal 2 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.2 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives78
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Double Concentrate Apple Litres has no fat, while Cherries and berries squash has 0.5 g.
  • Double Concentrate Apple Litres has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Double Concentrate Apple Litres has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cherries and berries squash

Water, apple juice from concentrate, acids: citric acid, maltic acid, cherry juice from concentrate, strawberry juice from concentrate, raspberry juice from concentrate, sodium citrate, sucralose, acesulfame k, anthocyanins, potassium sorbate, sodium metabisulphite

Double Concentrate Apple Litres

Water, Apple juice from concentrate (20%), Acids (citric acid, malic acid), Act regulator (sodium citrates), Sweeteners (acesulfame K, sucralose), Preservaties (potassium sorbate, sodium metabisulphite), Flavouring, Antioxidant (ascorbic Colour (plain caramel)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cherries and berries squash or Double Concentrate Apple Litres?

Overall, Double Concentrate Apple Litres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cherries and berries squash has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 2 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Double Concentrate Apple Litres has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons