Comparison

Cerneaux de noix bio vs Walnusskerne

Overall, Walnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCerneaux de noix bioWalnusskerne
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 688 kcal 716 kcal
Fat 63.8 g 69 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 6.5 g
Sugars 3.9 g 2.7 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 5.7 g 4.5 g
Protein 11.7 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensNutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cerneaux de noix bio has 12% less saturated fat (5.7 g vs 6.5 g).
  • Walnusskerne has 31% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Cerneaux de noix bio has 21% more fiber (5.7 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Walnusskerne has 27% more protein (16 g vs 11.7 g).
  • Walnusskerne has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cerneaux de noix bio

Cerneaux de noix invalides.

Walnusskerne

Cerneaux de noix 100%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cerneaux de noix bio or Walnusskerne?

Overall, Walnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cerneaux de noix bio has fewer calories: 688 kcal versus 716 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Walnusskerne has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons