Comparison
Walnusskerne vs Walnuts
Overall, Walnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Walnusskerne | Walnuts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 716 kcal | 693 kcal |
| Fat | 69 g | 68.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 14.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Walnusskerne has 13% less saturated fat (6.5 g vs 7.5 g).
- Walnusskerne has 22% more fiber (4.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Walnusskerne has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Walnusskerne
Cerneaux de noix 100%
Walnuts
WALNUT HALVES
FAQ
Which is healthier: Walnusskerne or Walnuts?
Overall, Walnusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Walnuts has fewer calories: 693 kcal versus 716 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Walnuts has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.