Carpaccio di polpo vs Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Carpaccio di polpo | Tentacoli di polpo cotto al... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 87 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has no sugar, while Carpaccio di polpo has 1.4 g.
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has 46% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.5 g).
- Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Carpaccio di polpo
Not available.
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (Octopus vulgaris-mollusco), sale, alloro
FAQ
Which is healthier: Carpaccio di polpo or Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 87 kcal versus 95 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tentacoli di polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.