Comparison
Caro vs Bambu
Overall, Caro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caro | Bambu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 7 kcal | 358 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caro has 98% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 358 kcal).
- Caro has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 16 g).
- Caro has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bambu has 97% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Caro
Gerste, Gerstenmalz, Zichorie, Roggen.
Bambu
chicory 40%, wheat 40%, figs and malted barley and acorns (20%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caro or Bambu?
Overall, Caro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caro has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 358 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caro has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 16 g per 100 g.