Comparison

Caro vs Cereales con achicoria

Overall, Cereales con achicoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCaroCereales con achicoria
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 7 kcal 357 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 0.1 g 16 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.2 g 9.2 g
Protein 0.1 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten, Malta

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Caro has 98% fewer calories (7 kcal vs 357 kcal).
  • Cereales con achicoria has no fat, while Caro has 0.5 g.
  • Caro has 99% less sugar (0.1 g vs 16 g).
  • Cereales con achicoria has 98% more fiber (9.2 g vs 0.2 g).
  • Cereales con achicoria has 98% more protein (4.9 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Only Cereales con achicoria lists: Malta.

Ingredients

Caro

Gerste, Gerstenmalz, Zichorie, Roggen.

Cereales con achicoria

Cebada (50%), malta (30%), achicoria (20%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Caro or Cereales con achicoria?

Overall, Cereales con achicoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Caro has fewer calories: 7 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Caro has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons