Comparison

Mati Malt vs Cereales con achicoria

Overall, Cereales con achicoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMati MaltCereales con achicoria
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 331 kcal 357 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 7 g 16 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 4.4 g 9.2 g
Protein 2.7 g 4.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten, Malta

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cereales con achicoria has no fat, while Mati Malt has 0.5 g.
  • Mati Malt has 56% less sugar (7 g vs 16 g).
  • Cereales con achicoria has 52% more fiber (9.2 g vs 4.4 g).
  • Cereales con achicoria has 45% more protein (4.9 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Only Cereales con achicoria lists: Malta.

Ingredients

Mati Malt

Chicorée 38%, seigle 33%, orge 24%, malt d'orge, glands, figues.

Cereales con achicoria

Cebada (50%), malta (30%), achicoria (20%)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mati Malt or Cereales con achicoria?

Overall, Cereales con achicoria has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mati Malt has fewer calories: 331 kcal versus 357 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mati Malt has less sugar: 7 g versus 16 g per 100 g.

More comparisons