Comparison
Caldo de pescado vs Salsa de soja
Overall, Salsa de soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pescado | Salsa de soja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 25 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 57.5 g | 9.5 g |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa de soja has 85% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Salsa de soja has no fat, while Caldo de pescado has 4.4 g.
- Salsa de soja has no saturated fat, while Caldo de pescado has 0.7 g.
- Caldo de pescado has 95% less sugar (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Salsa de soja has 83% less salt (9.5 g vs 57.5 g).
- Caldo de pescado has 77% more protein (15.5 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Caldo de pescado
Not available.
Salsa de soja
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pescado or Salsa de soja?
Overall, Salsa de soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa de soja has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pescado has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 2 g per 100 g.