Caldo de pescado vs Salsa Barbacoa
Overall, Salsa Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caldo de pescado | Salsa Barbacoa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 169 kcal | 121 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 24 g |
| Salt | 57.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Barbacoa has 28% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 169 kcal).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 84% less fat (0.7 g vs 4.4 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Caldo de pescado has 100% less sugar (0.1 g vs 24 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 96% less salt (2.2 g vs 57.5 g).
- Caldo de pescado has 93% more protein (15.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Caldo de pescado
Not available.
Salsa Barbacoa
Agua, puré de tomate doble concentrado 21%, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, vinagre de alcohol, jarabe de caramelo candi, azúcar, almidón modificado de maíz, sal, aceite de colza, espesante: goma xantana, conservador: sorbato de potásico, cebolla asada, aroma de humo, especias, aroma natural de comino.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caldo de pescado or Salsa Barbacoa?
Overall, Salsa Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Barbacoa has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caldo de pescado has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 24 g per 100 g.