Salsa Barbacoa vs Mayonesa Ybarra
Overall, Salsa Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa Barbacoa | Mayonesa Ybarra |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 121 kcal | 616 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 66 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 24 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Barbacoa has 80% fewer calories (121 kcal vs 616 kcal).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 99% less fat (0.7 g vs 66 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 7 g).
- Mayonesa Ybarra has 88% less sugar (3 g vs 24 g).
- Mayonesa Ybarra has 36% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 100% more fiber (1.2 g vs 0 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has 27% more protein (1.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Salsa Barbacoa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mayonesa Ybarra lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Salsa Barbacoa
Agua, puré de tomate doble concentrado 21%, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, vinagre de alcohol, jarabe de caramelo candi, azúcar, almidón modificado de maíz, sal, aceite de colza, espesante: goma xantana, conservador: sorbato de potásico, cebolla asada, aroma de humo, especias, aroma natural de comino.
Mayonesa Ybarra
Acuere de girasol (56%),agua, yema de huevo,Vinagre de vino, azucar, sal, aromas, zumo de limon,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa Barbacoa or Mayonesa Ybarra?
Overall, Salsa Barbacoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Barbacoa has fewer calories: 121 kcal versus 616 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mayonesa Ybarra has less sugar: 3 g versus 24 g per 100 g.