Comparison

Salsa Barbacoa vs Salsa de soja

Overall, Salsa de soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalsa BarbacoaSalsa de soja
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 121 kcal 25 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0 g
Sugars 24 g 2 g
Salt 2.2 g 9.5 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 1.1 g 3.6 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salsa de soja has 79% fewer calories (25 kcal vs 121 kcal).
  • Salsa de soja has no fat, while Salsa Barbacoa has 0.7 g.
  • Salsa de soja has 92% less sugar (2 g vs 24 g).
  • Salsa Barbacoa has 77% less salt (2.2 g vs 9.5 g).
  • Salsa de soja has 69% more protein (3.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Salsa Barbacoa has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salsa Barbacoa

Agua, puré de tomate doble concentrado 21%, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa, vinagre de alcohol, jarabe de caramelo candi, azúcar, almidón modificado de maíz, sal, aceite de colza, espesante: goma xantana, conservador: sorbato de potásico, cebolla asada, aroma de humo, especias, aroma natural de comino.

Salsa de soja

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salsa Barbacoa or Salsa de soja?

Overall, Salsa de soja has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa de soja has fewer calories: 25 kcal versus 121 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsa de soja has less sugar: 2 g versus 24 g per 100 g.

More comparisons