Comparison

Calabaza y Nuez vs Pan Tostado Classic

Overall, Calabaza y Nuez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCalabaza y NuezPan Tostado Classic
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 266 kcal 411 kcal
Fat 7 g 9 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.9 g
Sugars 4.4 g 4 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.7 g
Fiber 0 g 4.4 g
Protein 15 g 11.1 g
Additives30
AllergensGluten, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, TRIGO

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Calabaza y Nuez has 35% fewer calories (266 kcal vs 411 kcal).
  • Calabaza y Nuez has 22% less fat (7 g vs 9 g).
  • Calabaza y Nuez has 47% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Pan Tostado Classic has 100% more fiber (4.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Calabaza y Nuez has 26% more protein (15 g vs 11.1 g).
  • Calabaza y Nuez has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Calabaza y Nuez lists: Nuts, Soybeans.
  • Only Pan Tostado Classic lists: TRIGO.

Ingredients

Calabaza y Nuez

Harina de Trigo Blanca e Integral, Agua, Levadura, Gluten, Semillas de Calabaza (5%), Soya, Azúcar, Quinua, Nueces (1%), Sal, Aceite de Canola, Lecitina de Soya, Aditivo Natural (Extracto de Romero), Aditivo de Origen Natural, Sabor Natural.

Pan Tostado Classic

Harina de TRIGO (GLUTEN), aceite de girasol alto oleico, levadura, azúcar, GLUTEN de TRIGO, sal, dextrosa y agente de tratamiento de la harina: ácido ascórbico. Puede contener trazas de CACAHUETE, SOJA, DERIVADOS LÁCTEOS, MOSTAZA y SÉSAMO.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Calabaza y Nuez or Pan Tostado Classic?

Overall, Calabaza y Nuez has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Calabaza y Nuez has fewer calories: 266 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pan Tostado Classic has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons